I was Just Reading About BPH (See Below), What, In your Estimation, Accounts for the Dramatic Difference -?

-In Incidence Between Rural and Urban Populations In China?

The Entry:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Benign_prostatic_hyperplasia#Etiology

Thanks John, I Suspect a Mechanical Explanation.
Thanks Paul.
John and Paul, Palliative Things?

Like John, I would suggest diet.

Rural China, by the way, was the scene for part of a massive comparative study, strongly indicating the virtues of a traditional, high-fibre, low animal protein diet.

Seethe "China-Oxford-Cornell Diet and Health Project"; described in:

The China Study: The Most Comprehensive Study of Nutrition Ever Conducted and the Startling Implications for Diet, Weight Loss and Long-term Health

by T. Colin Campbell, Jacob Gould Schurman Professor of Nutritional Biochemistry at Cornell University.

This entry was posted on Friday, December 4th, 2009 at 11:51 pm and is filed under Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

«
»

2 Responses to “I was Just Reading About BPH (See Below), What, In your Estimation, Accounts for the Dramatic Difference -?”

  1. John de Witt Says: December 5th, 2009 at 4:57 am

    No idea, really, but dietary phytoestrogens might be a good hypothesis to look at.
    References :

  2. Paul B Says: December 5th, 2009 at 5:18 am

    Like John, I would suggest diet.

    Rural China, by the way, was the scene for part of a massive comparative study, strongly indicating the virtues of a traditional, high-fibre, low animal protein diet.

    Seethe "China-Oxford-Cornell Diet and Health Project"; described in:

    The China Study: The Most Comprehensive Study of Nutrition Ever Conducted and the Startling Implications for Diet, Weight Loss and Long-term Health

    by T. Colin Campbell, Jacob Gould Schurman Professor of Nutritional Biochemistry at Cornell University.
    References :

Leave a Reply